Solutions
Infrastructure as Code / Terraform
Your Terraform is scarier than the infrastructure it manages.
Fix Our TerraformThe problem
Module structure, state strategy and review workflow that make infrastructure changes routine instead of risky.
Who it's for
Teams with a monolithic root module, drifted environments, or a plan output nobody reads because it is 400 lines long.
Approach
How we work through it.
- 01
Split state by blast radius so one apply cannot take down unrelated systems.
- 02
Build a small set of reviewed modules instead of copy-pasted environment folders.
- 03
Import what exists by hand; delete what nothing depends on.
- 04
Run plan in CI on every pull request with policy checks and cost estimation attached.
- 05
Detect drift on a schedule and treat it as a defect, not a fact of life.
Deliverables
What you end up with.
- Module library with versioning
- State layout and backend strategy
- PR-based plan, policy and cost checks
- Drift detection and remediation process
- Contributor guide for your engineers
Technologies
- Terraform
- OpenTofu
- Terragrunt
- Atlantis
- Checkov
- Infracost
- GitHub Actions
Typical engagement
4–8 weeks, typically refactoring one environment at a time with no service interruption.
Questions
Before you email us.
- Terraform or OpenTofu?
- Both are viable and the migration between them is currently straightforward. We help you decide based on licensing posture and tooling, and structure the code so the choice stays reversible.
- Can you refactor state without downtime?
- Yes. State moves and imports do not touch running infrastructure when done carefully — the risk is in the plan review, which is exactly what we tighten first.
Start with a two-week Infrastructure Review.
Fixed scope, starting at €3,000, and a 90-day roadmap you keep whether or not we implement it.