Approach
Consultants leave slides. We leave systems.
How we work: diagnose with evidence, design with explicit trade-offs, build in two-week increments, and hand over runbooks so your team can run it without us.
Diagnose
We read the code, the bills and the incident history before proposing anything. Findings are written down and shared, not delivered as a slide-deck opinion.
Design
A target architecture with trade-offs made explicit: what it costs, what it buys, what it rules out. You approve before anyone provisions a thing.
Build
Two-week increments, everything in code and in your repositories from day one. No black boxes, no vendor lock to us.
Hand over
Runbooks, dashboards and pairing sessions until your team is running it without us. Then we stay only if you want us to.
Principles
The rules we do not bend.
Evidence over opinion
Every recommendation is backed by something measurable: a bill line, a trace, an incident, a benchmark. If we cannot measure it, we say so.
Your repos, your accounts
Infrastructure lives in your version control and your cloud accounts from the first commit. There is no Aspiron-shaped hole left when we leave.
Boring by default
We use proven tools for the load-bearing parts. Novel technology has to justify the operational cost it adds to your on-call rotation.
Small increments, visible progress
Two-week cycles with a working, deployed result at the end of each. You can stop or redirect at any boundary.
Cost is a design constraint
Architecture decisions carry a monthly number. We put that number on the table before it appears on your invoice.
Teach as we build
Pairing, written decision records and runbooks are part of delivery, not a paid extra at the end.